September 30, 2005

Neo-Con Radio Talk Show Hosts

 

CONGRESSMAN JACKSON
 
CALLS ON FCC
 
 TO CENSURE AND FINE
 
 BILL BENNETT
 
 
 
Congressman Jesse L. Jackson, Jr. today said, "William Bennett
 
should be censured and fined by the Federal Communications Commission
 
for his repugnant and barbarous remarks during his morning radio
 
program."
 
 
 
Jackson added, "The FCC should take decisive action to prevent our
 
public airwaves from being further contaminated by Mr. Bennett's
 
outrageous and outlandish comments.  As many Americans, I was shocked
 
to hear the disgusting views of the former U.S. Education Secretary
 
and self-proclaimed values czar.
 
 
 
"In my view, I believe the airwaves belong to the public and should
 
be reserved for the public good.  Bennett's comments did nothing but
 
undermine it," concluded Jackson.
 
 
 
During his morning program on Wednesday, Bennett said, "if you
 
wanted to reduce crime...if that were your sole purpose, you could
 
abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go
 
down."
 
 
 
To listen to Bennett's comments, go to:
 

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK just last week pointed out the remarks made by Rush Limbaugh, known for his "Neo-Con right wingPropaganda and pain pill problems.  We find it sad that some actually listen to and believe the hatred and hypocritical remarks and comments made by such on a daily basis that divide our great nation. Furthermore; we find it quite questionable that Broadcasters allow such programming on the air waves.  There comes a time when common sense people say Enough Is Enough, turn the dial and Advertisers refuse to sponsor such programs. However, we at Choice America understand that it is indeed all about Choice but Bennett and Limbaugh are blatant idiots. Therefore, CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK hereby strongly agrees that Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr., again, has the correct solution to the problem.

In 1988 Limbaugh said:

"And now the liberals want to stop President Reagan from selling chemical warfare agents and military equipment to Saddam Hussein, and why? Because Saddam 'allegedly' gassed a few Kurds in his own country.

"Mark my words. All of this talk of Saddam Hussein being a 'war
criminal' or 'committing crimes against humanity' is the same old
thing. LIBERAL HATE SPEECH!  And speaking of poison gas . . . I SAY WE ROUND UP ALL THE DRUG ADDICTS AND GAS THEM."


 - Rush Limbaugh, Nov. 3, 1988

 


Statement by

 Congressman Harold Ford, Jr.

Regarding Bill Bennett's

 Comments on Salem Radio Network

 

Washington, D.C. -- Congressman Harold Ford released the following statement in response to Bill Bennett's comments on Salem Radio Network:

 

"To advocate the killing black babies as a way to reduce crime is the dumbest and most heinous thing a person of faith or any human being could say.  It is indefensible.  Salem Radio Network should remove Mr. Bennett and if they choose not to, they should be severely punished by the Federal Communications Commission.  Mr. Bennett owes America an apology." 

 


CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 09:20:31 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 29, 2005

Bush Running Down and Out

 
 
Bush's Leadership:
 
 Running on Empty
 
 
by Joan Vennochi
 

George W. Bush is running out of gas, and the country knows it.

This week, the president asked Americans to drive less to conserve gasoline. Bush also issued a directive for all federal agencies to cut their own energy use and to encourage employees to use public transportation.

How about parking Air Force One for awhile, Mr. President?

Bush took his seventh trip to view hurricane rebuilding efforts along the Gulf Coast. Storm-chasing, like mountain-biking, is now a presidential obsession. Instead of calories, this latest compulsion burns time and jet fuel.

After Hurricane Katrina, Bush and federal relief agencies took too long to show up when it mattered. But showing up when it doesn't matter will not repair the damage to Bush's battered image. Having Michael Brown, the deposed head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency blame "dysfunctional" Louisiana for hurricane response problems doesn't help Bush either. "Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job" is a presidential assessment that already stands to haunt Bush for a long time.

It's time for the president to get out of the floodwaters. A successful CEO does not work the assembly line, although showing up to watch it once in a while isn't a bad idea. A successful CEO has a strong vision, can articulate it, and makes certain to hire competent professionals to implement it from top to bottom.

Americans are losing faith in Bush, the country's CEO, on all three counts. Restoring public confidence takes more than photo-ops to hurricane-ravaged territory.

During last year's presidential campaign, Bush cultivated a cowboy-booted, man of the people image. It helped him come across as more approachable than his opponent. More recently, from Cindy Sheehan to Katrina, the country saw the arrogance of power a Bush presidency can breed. The president who could drive past a Gold Star mother because he does not agree with her politics could also fly over a drowning city.

Katrina unleashed such public and political fury that Bush was forced to address it. But his efforts to connect with the American people have fallen fall short of his iconic "bullhorn" moment at Ground Zero after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Belatedly accepting responsibility for the system-wide breakdown after Katrina helped Bush a bit. His follow-up speech from New Orleans was relatively well-received, but its policy implications were controversial within his own party. Since then, Hurricane Rita struck Texas and Lousiana with less force than predicted. Even so, hurricane-related disruptions in oil production leave the country facing higher energy costs in the coming winter.

Now, belatedly, the president asks for sacrifice from the average citizen. That concept, like many, is foreign to Bush. Because of his administration's policies, sacrifice is foreign to us, too. And that is a problem for the president.

His entire presidency is based on the premise that Americans can have it all, without sacrifice. We can wage a bloody, costly war and not feel any pinch in resources at home. We can cut taxes and still have No Child Left Behind. We can drive gas-guzzling SUVS without regard for dependence on foreign oil. We can eliminate the estate tax and still rebuild New Orleans.

This administration believes in new oil production, not conservation. It chose not to impose higher mileage standard on automakers. Bush's indifference to repeated warnings of global warming is now coming back to haunt him, too, in the form of rising seas. The next time, those waters may wash right up the Potomac to engulf Washington, D.C. The political waters already have.

Where in the president's call for sacrifice is any sense that he now understands the disconnect between his policies and better government, responsive to all, not just the wealthy few? Where in his call for sacrifice is any sense that he is in this post-Katrina-Rita mess with the rest of us?

Bush and his father may get gussied up like cowpokes every so often so the press corps will think they are self-made men. But more Americans understand a Bush administration operates the federal government as a wholly owned subsidiary of America's capitalist class. Bush has nothing but disdain for those clinging desperately to society's bottom rungs. And Bush's weak call for our sacrifice shows disdain for those clinging to the middle rungs, too.

The simple truth: Making an actual sacrifice is less painful than listening to Bush talk about it.

© 2005 Boston Globe

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 06:03:52 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 27, 2005

The Antiwar Movement

 
The News Media
 
 and
 
The Antiwar Movement
 
by Norman Solomon
 
 

It's reasonable to estimate that more than a quarter of a million people demonstrated against the Iraq war on Saturday in Washington, Los Angeles, San Francisco and other U.S. cities. The next day, the Washington Post front-paged a decent story that described "the largest show of antiwar sentiment in the nation's capital since the conflict in Iraq began." But more perfunctory back-page articles were typical in daily papers across the country. And over the weekend, many TV news watchers saw little or nothing about the protests.

Hurricane Rita was clearly a factor. But even without dramatic natural disasters, the news media are ready, willing and able to downplay news about war -- and the antiwar movement -- for any number of reasons. Conventional wisdom on Capitol Hill or in newsrooms can tamp down media coverage of a surging movement. What's crucial is that the movement not allow its momentum to be interrupted by media treatment.

If "journalism is the first draft of history," the journalism of corporate media is usually the quickie top-down view of history that's told from vantage points far removed from progressive movements. Media technologies and styles aside, what we're experiencing now from major U.S. news outlets is not very different from the coverage of the Vietnam War.

A persistent myth is that mainstream American news outlets were tough on the war in Vietnam while boosting the antiwar movement. And these days -- after a summer of plunging poll numbers for President Bush along with the profoundly important media presence of Cindy Sheehan -- many people seem to think that the news media have turned against the war makers in Washington. But overall the media realities are something else. Actual history should make us wary of any assumption that the press is apt to be a counterweight to militarism.

Vietnam "was the first war in which reporters were routinely accredited to accompany military forces yet not subject to censorship," media scholar Daniel Hallin wrote in his excellent book "The 'Uncensored War': The Media and Vietnam." The authorities in Washington figured they could expect correspondents not to wander too far in terms of content; "the integration of the media into the political establishment was assumed to be secure enough that the last major vestige of direct government control -- military censorship in wartime -- could be lifted."

Some reporters exercised a significant degree of independence. And, Hallin concluded, "this did matter: in 1963, when American policy in Vietnam began to fall apart, the media began to send back an image that conflicted sharply with the picture of progress officials were trying to paint. It would happen again many times before the war was over. But those reporters also went to Southeast Asia schooled in a set of journalistic practices which, among other things, ensured that the news would reflect, if not always the views of those at the very top of the American political hierarchy, at least the perspectives of American officialdom generally."

Despite all the changes in news media since then, a systemic filtration process remains crucial. Strong economic pressures are especially significant -- and combine with powerful forces for conformity at times of war. "Even if journalists, editors, and producers are not superpatriots, they know that appearing unpatriotic does not play well with many readers, viewers, and sponsors," media analyst Michael X. Delli Carpini has commented. "Fear of alienating the public and sponsors, especially in wartime, serves as a real, often unstated tether, keeping the press tied to accepted wisdom." Journalists in American newsrooms don't have to worry about being taken out and shot; the constraining fears are apt to revolve around peer approval, financial security and professional advancement.

Interviewed in early November 2003, with the Iraq occupation in the midst of turning into a large-scale war against a growing insurgency, Hallin compared media treatment of the two wars and saw similar patterns. "As you begin to get a breakdown of consensus, especially among political elites in Washington, then the media begin asking more questions," he said. In the case of the Iraq occupation, "the Democrats were mostly silent for a long time on this war, and when things began to bog down, they started asking questions. There were divisions within the Bush administration, and then the media starts playing a more independent role."

To a notable degree, reporters seem to await signals from politicians and high-level appointees to widen the range of discourse. "They need confirmation that this issue is part of the mainstream political discussion in the U.S.," Hallin commented. "Journalists are very keyed into what their sources are talking about. Political reporters define news worthiness in part by what's going to affect American politics in the sense of who gets elected the next time around. But it isn't absolutely only elites. I think it also makes a difference that polls show the public divided, and that there are problems of morale among soldiers in Iraq. But the first thing that the journalists look to is: 'What are the elites debating in Washington?' That's what really sets the news agenda."

So, with the autumn of 2005 underway, what are the elites debating in Washington? With rare exceptions, they're debating how to continue the U.S. occupation of Iraq.

High-profile Democrats and even some Republicans like to bemoan "mistakes" and bad planning and the absence of an "exit strategy." The prevailing version of Washington's debate over Iraq still amounts to disputes over how to proceed with the U.S. war effort in Iraq. Top officials and politicians in Washington won't change that. The journalists echoing them won't change that. The antiwar movement must.

Norman Solomon is the author of the new book "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death." For information, go to: www.WarMadeEasy.com.

 

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 08:50:20 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 26, 2005

Health - FDA Commissioner Resigns

 

SHED NO TEARS

 

FDA Commissioner Lester Crawford abruptly resigned on Friday, Sept. 23, 2005. His resignation is effective immediately.

"After three and a half years as Deputy Commissioner, Acting Commissioner and, finally, as Commissioner, it is time at the age of 67, to step aside," Crawford said in a memorandum to FDA staff.

Sources familiar with his departure said Crawford was asked to resign.  Crawford's tenure was marked by increasing criticism of the agency by those who contended it had become more interested in politics than in its mission to protect consumers.  Asked if he was forced to resign, HHS spokeswoman Christina Pearson declined to comment further, calling it a personnel issue.

Last month, morale at the agency plummeted when Crawford indefinitely postponed nonprescription sales of morning-after contraception over the objections of staff scientists who had declared the pill safe. FDA's women's health chief resigned.

Many FDA critics lauded Crawford's departure.

"The American consumer should shed no tears at Mr. Crawford's resignation," said Sen. Byron Dorgan, a North Dakota Democrat who voted against Crawford's confirmation. "The fact is, he took the side of the pharmaceutical industry and against consumers at virtually every opportunity."

"In recent years, the FDA has demonstrated a too-cozy relationship with the pharmaceutical industry and an attitude of shielding rather than disclosing information," said Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, who has spent 18 months investigating the agency.

Crawford was confirmed as head of the FDA by the Senate on July 18. President Bush nominated him for the position in February.  He had managed the agency since he became acting commissioner in March 2004 following Dr. Mark B. McClellan's tenure as commissioner. Previously Crawford had served as deputy commissioner during 2002.

 

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 13:51:08 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 24, 2005

The Hypocrisy Amongst Us

 
 
 
 

Quotes from when Clinton

 

 

Committed troops to Bosinia:

 

 



"You can support the troops but not the president."
--Rep Tom Delay (R-TX)



"Well, I just think it's a bad idea. What's going to happen is they're going to be over there for 10, 15, maybe 20 years."
--Joe Scarborough (R-FL)



"Explain to the mothers and fathers of American servicemen that may come home in body bags why their son or daughter have to give up their life?"
--Sean Hannity, Fox News, 4/6/99



"[The] President . . . is once again releasing American military might on a foreign country with an ill-defined objective and no exit strategy. He has yet to tell the Congress how much this operation will cost. And he has not informed our nation's armed forces about how long they will be away from home. These strikes do not make for a sound foreign policy."
--Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA)



"American foreign policy is now one huge big mystery. Simply put, the administration is trying to lead the world with a feel-good foreign policy."
--Rep Tom Delay (R-TX)



"If we are going to commit American troops, we must be certain they have a clear mission, an achievable goal and an exit strategy."
--Karen Hughes, speaking on behalf of George W Bush



"I had doubts about the bombing campaign from the beginning . . I didn't think we had done enough in the diplomatic area."
--Senator Trent Lott (R-MS)



"I cannot support a failed foreign policy. History teaches us that it is often easier to make war than peace. This administration is just learning that lesson right now. The President began this mission with very vague objectives and lots of unanswered questions. A month later, these questions are still unanswered. There are no clarified rules of engagement. There is no timetable. There is no legitimate definition of victory. There is no contingency plan for mission creep. There is no clear funding program. There is no agenda to bolster our over-extended military. There is no explanation defining what vital national interests are at stake. There was no strategic plan for war when the President started this thing, and there still is no plan today"
--Rep Tom Delay (R-TX)



"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is."
--Governor George W. Bush (R-TX)

 

 

 

*********************************

 

 

And finally,....

 

Rush Limbaugh a/k/a Dr. PainKiller

 is every bit as hypocritical as the politicians

 and need not be allowed on the air waves:



"And now the liberals want to stop President Reagan from selling chemical warfare agents and military equipment to Saddam Hussein, and why? Because Saddam 'allegedly' gassed a few Kurds in his own country.

"Mark my words. All of this talk of Saddam Hussein being a 'war
criminal' or 'committing crimes against humanity' is the same old
thing. LIBERAL HATE SPEECH! And speaking of poison gas . . . I SAY WE ROUND UP ALL THE DRUG ADDICTS AND GAS THEM."

Rush Limbaugh, Nov. 3, 1988

 

**********************************

Turn Limbaugh Off.  Get Back to Reality.  Stop the Divide.

Stop the Hate.  Stop the Lies.  Seek the Truth within Your Heart.

It's disturbing we let Hypocrisy flourish in such an educated nation as

Our America.

 When do YOU say Enough is Enough?

Think About It.

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 10:20:33 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 21, 2005

The Enemy From Within - Part III

 

THE ENEMY FROM WITHIN

 

Part III of V

 

PTSD

 

POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER

 

 AND THE

 

 CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

 

BY DAVID FRIEDMAN

 

 

We all have it. The capacity to hate, the capacity for anger.  It is born out of chaos, and it requires years of experiences with comments made in anger, actions created by hateful reactions, people we care about hurt before we learn to control this enemy.  Some of us will never learn.  Some of us will never be in a position to see what the passion that comes in anger can do to another human being.  

 

The worst chaos imaginable, WAR, has the power to bring this anger and hate to a place where it can no longer be controlled, no matter how strong we are.  And the strongest of us, when the time for "hating the enemy" is over, in many instances turn our anger on ourselves, for what we have become – for what it was that we allowed to control us.

 

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a complex health condition that can develop in response to a traumatic experience – a life-threatening or extremely distressing situation that causes a person to feel intense fear, horror or a sense of helplessness.

 

Soldiers returning from combat in Iraq face a high risk of suffering from PTSD, due to the unprecedented need for vigilance, not only regarding their own safety, but also for the safety of civilians in the midst of non-stop guerilla warfare.

 

If the soldiers who suffer from PTSD are not given the care they need, if they are not given the time and the calm places in which to heal, they will be driven deeper into their anger, and eventually pushed over the edge. 

 

A crime against humanity, and sadly, the worst crime of all for the citizens of this country who continue to support war, for it is against those who have made the sacrifice to defend us, who have trusted their leadership to respect them because of the significance of that sacrifice.   They have been, and continue to be, let down and disrespected at every level.

 

Where is the leadership that understands the significance of what these soldiers have given???  More importantly, when will the people of this country see that the sacrifice hasn't been given, it has been taken, by leaders who believe they deserve complete servitude; that our soldiers give up all humanity when they VOLUNTEER to defend what our constitution stands for. 

 

There is nothing worse than blind indifference to the pain of those who give all that they have for lies; those who know that they cannot get out of the madness without the help of people who just can't wake up to see the anguish our soldiers are in.  This sense of violation is the final straw that will push these soldiers over the edge.  When they reach out for help and their leaders tell them they are "malingering;" they need to "get back to the front and back into battle to keep the adrenalin flowing," to cure their lack of confidence, or the people they count on will not listen when they try to express their concerns, the people they reach out to are disregarding the needs of fellow human beings. 

 

CRIMES… we are all complicit until we see war for what it is, and take a stand to stop the madness. 

 

Where are the leaders?  When will those responsible be held accountable for what they have done, and continue to do, in the name of an illusion? 

 

These leaders have not been at Ft. Stewart, Georgia.  The 3rd Infantry Division has a history of ensuring that every soldier is "in the fight" regardless of what the fight does to the soldier.  The popular creed these days seems to be "Mission First.  Take care of the soldiers by completing the mission, at all cost.  We'll get more soldiers.  They're just kids, a dime a dozen.  They're just fathers, mothers, sons, and daughters.  We can throw them away.  Oil matters, egos matter, the illusion of leadership matters, POWER, CONTROL, not letting anyone see the incompetence, all matter more than the humanity of our soldiers."  THIS.. is leadership????? 

 

At Ft. Stewart, soldiers must go to war, no matter what their humanity says differently. 

 

One soldier requested compassionate reassignment because a brother, their only sibling, was dying.  The command of Ft. Stewart turned down this request, citing that "105% of all military personnel were needed in Iraq, so no compassionate reassignments were being considered."  It took months of letters, hounding the administration, and this soldier deployed.  Finally, months into the deployment this soldier received word that they had been given their reassignment.  By this time, it was not much longer before they redeployed home.  Why do we have to apply that much pressure to get a "leader" to do the right thing? 

 

Soldiers on medical profile were treated as "malingering," or came face to face with a physician who was willing to tear up medical profiles and re-write them to show that soldiers who had never received treatment for their conditions had miraculously become deployable. 

 

One of the soldiers at Ft. Stewart was on medical profile for a condition that caused him to be deaf.  He had his records, and was scheduled to report for treatment and a medical discharge.  One night, this young soldier was wakened by his sergeant barreling into his barracks room ordering him to get up and get his equipment.  He would be deploying with his unit, or he would face 11 years in jail.  In the night, hearing impaired, and young, what is a soldier to do?

 

A soldier attempted suicide on the morning of deployment.  For months after his return from Iraq, this soldier requested treatment from the mental health counselors.  His commanders refused to listen, saying that he was "malingering."  Rather than give him the help he needed, and asked for, they threatened him, abused him emotionally, and the abuse took its toll.  He was taken to a local hospital, but the command didn't want his story to be told, so they hastily moved him to the Army hospital, refusing entry to his spouse.  He went AWOL, and then returned after his Rear Detachment commander made promises of help. When the mental health counselors informed his commander that this soldier required treatment under their care for at least 5 weeks, the commander ignored the recommendation and sent this soldier to Iraq, back to the same command that disregarded his health to begin with. 

 

On the night before his deployment, another Ft. Stewart soldier grabbed a bottle of prescription medication and a gun.  He got into his vehicle, drove off post to a highway not far away, pulled over to the side of the road and swallowed the pills in the bottle.  As the pills began to take effect, this soldier, a veteran of the invasion, then got out of his vehicle with his gun and walked along the edge of the highway away from his car.  The medication worked, in more ways than one, and he passed out along the side of the road before he could use the gun. 

 

This soldier was placed in the Psych unit of the Army hospital, where he was observed throughout the following week.  Doctors in the Psych unit told him that he was "malingering" and threatened with jail time.  He was ordered to deploy, and was sent to Iraq less than two weeks after he had attempted suicide.  Why did he take the pills?  He was scheduled to leave the military that same month, but the Army stop/lossed him, and rather than getting out, he was looking forward to another year and 4 months in combat, never having had his emotional condition addressed. 

 

There are uncounted cases of these stories on Ft. Stewart.  Doctors and commanders, self-proclaimed leaders who care about their soldiers, give the illusion, but actions present a different perspective.  Soldiers have gone AWOL, 12 from one unit, and have stayed away for so long they were dropped from the rolls.  Where is the accounting?  How many more have suffered that will never be known, because leaders chose to hide the truth, to cover the facts, to distort reality? 

 

Many in America want to know why more soldiers don't speak out against war, and the atrocities from it, if indeed they exist.  They do exist, and soldiers are speaking.  Their actions are telling us so much more than their words ever could.  But no one can hear because their voices are being muffled by those who claim to lead them. No one can hear because the outcry of these soldiers has been turned off with rhetoric, documents lost and access to the installations cut off for civilians who could make a difference if they knew the truth. 

 

PTSD manifests itself in so many ways.  Every aspect displays itself in the emotional turmoil that exists within each soldier.  But just as a soldier is an individual, the outward demonstrations of PTSD are as well.  There are many victims when a soldier suffers. 

 

On a small grassy median just in front of the Ft. Stewart PX complex, was a memorial that stood for 2 months.  One hundred and ninety one small blue pinwheels spun in the breezes during the spring months.  On a poster behind the pinwheels words read, "A memorial to the 191 confirmed cases of child abuse in the 3rd ID, on Ft. Stewart and Hunter Army Airfield, in the last year." 

                              

 WHO KNEW??
 
 
 What more needs to be said?
 
 
 
 
 
 
Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 13:17:34 | Permanent Link | Comments (3) |

The Words and Wisdom of President Dwight D. Eisenhower

 

THE WARNING

Military-Industrial Complex

Speech,

Dwight D. Eisenhower,

1961

My fellow Americans:

Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.

This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.

Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.

Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.

My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.

In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.

II.

We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.

III.

Throughout America's adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.

Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology -- global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger is poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle -- with liberty the stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research -- these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs -- balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage -- balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.

The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.

IV.

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present

  • and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientifictechnological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system -- ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

V.

Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we -- you and I, and our government -- must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

VI.

Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.

Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose differences, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war -- as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years -- I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.

Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.

VII.

So -- in this my last good night to you as your President -- I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find some things worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.

You and I -- my fellow citizens -- need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation's great goals.

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America's prayerful and continuing aspiration:

We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.

 

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 09:13:05 | Permanent Link | Comments (1) |

September 20, 2005

Bush and Congress must be held accountable

 

"Not only George Bush


but the United States Congress


must be held accountable for this war"

 

Hi, my name is Anita. My son is Darrell Anderson, an Iraq War Veteran with a Purple Heart. Darrell served in Iraq for 7 months. He joined the army after 9/11 to protect his country from another terrorist attack. While Darrell was in Boot Camp, George W. Bush and the United States Army invaded Iraq. Shortly after Darrell completed his training, he was deployed to Iraq and sent to Baghdad.

None of Darrell's training had prepared him for what he was about to experience. Darrell said there were no soldiers just Iraqi people who were victims of our Shock and Awe attack. We bombed their City, Killing innocent people. We left them homeless, scared and desperate. Darrell said he was fighting Iraqi civilians; many were teenage boys or old men who had lost family members when we bombed their city.
   
One day while Darrell was on guard duty at a check point in Baghdad a car was approaching and he could see it was a woman with her children. Darrell was ordered to shoot, he called out "It is just a woman with her kids." He was again ordered to shoot, but he said he felt no danger and he did not shoot. It turned out Darrell was correct: the woman posed no threat. Darrell was told, "The next time you are ordered to shoot you better shoot."

This is just one of the tragic events that convinced Darrell that he could not support this war. There were no soldiers to fight, no weapons of mass destruction, not one of the terrorists involved in 9/11 was from Iraq. He did not want to become what he was supposed to be fighting against (a terrorist).

No matter what lies George Bush tells us about this war, I know the truth because Darrell, Josh Keys and Ivan Brobeck - all who served in Iraq - told me the truth. They are all Iraq war resisters living in Canada, speaking out every chance they get at anti-war protests, rallies and marches. They are doing interviews telling the world their stories.
 
They are truly American Heroes standing up for what they believe in, refusing to be part of this illegal war for a second time and refusing to go to jail for defending their moral convictions . These young men sit in Canada waiting to see if they will get refugee status. Some say they are cowards for going to Canada. They believe it was their only choice. They believe they should not have to go to jail for refusing to kill innocent people.

As a parent of a soldier that served in Iraq, I believe that not only George Bush but the United States Congress must be held accountable for this war.

 

CHOICE AMERICA NETWORK

 

 

Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 07:49:30 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 17, 2005

Palast Slams Galloway

 
GALLOWAY: DEADLY ANTI-ABORTION THREATS
 
 FROM REPUBLICAN'S FAVORITE "LEFTIST"
 
Saturday, September 17, 2005
 
Note: Palast and Cindy Sheehan will be speaking at the Operation Ceasefire concert sponsored by DC Anti-War Network and United for Peace and Justice -- all day and night at the Washington Monument.
 
by Greg Palast
 
During his debate with Salman Rushdie at the recent Edinburgh TV Festival, someone asked George Galloway if television should broadcast an adaptation of Rushdie's novel, "Satanic Verses." According to Rushdie, Galloway replied, "If you don't respect religion, you have to suffer the consequences."
 
Holy Jesus! This was, unmistakably, an endorsement of the death-sentence fatwa issued against Rushdie by Ayatollah Khomeini.
 
Add this endorsement of killing for God to Galloway's notorious opposition in Parliament to a woman's right to choose abortion, and you get yourself a British Pat Robertson. What next? Will he be "saluting the courage, strength and indefatigability" of abortion clinic bombers, as he saluted Saddam?
 
The Honorable Member of Britain's House of Commons has become the new love-child of American progressives for his in-your-face accusations about our own government's mendacity in sending our troops to war in Iraq. I myself quoted Galloway with admiration.
 
But the man who saluted the "courage" of Saddam Hussein in 1994, who today can't and won't account for nearly a million dollars in income and expenditures for a charity he founded to buy medicine for Iraqi children is not, friends, the best choice as our anti-war spokesman.
 
Where did this guy come from? Who invited him here? The answer: US Senate REPUBLICANS. As Cindy Sheehan was gathering public sympathy as the Gold Star mom against the killing in Iraq, the Republican party decided to import an easier target to pummel. So they brought over the "I-salute-your-courage, Saddam" religious fundamentalist crack-pot who can't tell us where the money went.
 
That's why the Republicans chose him for us. This gross cartoon from abroad whose "charity" is stuffed with loot from an Oil-for-Food profiteer is the image they prefer on TV to Cindy Sheehan whom they dare not confront.
 
Yes, Galloway was the punching bag that punched back, and for that we are appreciative. Now GO HOME, George.
 
We need to repudiate this guy -- before the warmongers do, with glee.
 
I'm sorry, but I'm not going to let Karl Rove or some sick GOP Senator pick my heroes for me.
 
Some well-meaning progressives have said that my exposing Galloway plays into the hands of the "other side." Friends, this isn't a World Cup match, with sides; it's a World War, with too many dead bodies piling up.
 
Galloway says, "I have religious beliefs and try to live by them. I have all my life been against abortion and against euthanasia."
 
Well, Mr. Galloway, you may live by your beliefs -- anti-choice, fatwas, Saddam's "courage" -- but too many are DYING by your beliefs.
 
I admit, I was suckered by Galloway. I was the first journalist in the UK to rush to his defense on television when he was accused of wrong-doing. I wanted to believe in him, but the hard facts condemn him -- and us, if we don't act true to our moral imperative.
 
Mr. Galloway told the Independent newspaper, "I'm not as Left-wing as you think."
 
Indeed, he isn't.
 
Next Saturday, September 24, Cindy Sheehan and I will be speaking at the Operation Ceasefire gathering in Washington DC, sponsored by the DC Anti-War Network and United for Peace and Justice. Please join us.
 
Hopefully, our voices won't be drowned out by George Galloway's antics.
 
 
**********
Greg Palast's commentaries can be heard on the CD "Weapon of Mass Instruction" (Alternative Tentacles 2004) produced by Matt Pascarella and Jello Biafra. Jello will host Palast, The Coup, LeTigre, Bouncing Souls and others at the Operation Ceasefire event at the Washington Monument. Research on Galloway was directed by investigator Leni von Eckardt.
 
 
Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 20:28:31 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |

September 16, 2005

because I tell you the truth,.....

 

"Am I therefore

 

become your enemy

 

 because I tell you the truth?"

 

by Sgt. Kevin Benderman - Conscientious Objector to War
 
 
It is an interesting question, and a thought-provoking one, from the Bible. It is one that, I believe, is the essence of why I am in jail.  The truth I told grew from my experiences in the war in Iraq.  I went there with the desire to avenge the people who died on September 11, 2001, and to keep the soldiers that I served with safe in the process.  I went as a soldier in the service of my country, never once thinking that my government would mislead me or lie to me not in order to advance the good of the country, but to fulfill a seemingly personal agenda of a few individuals. The truth that I had to tell came from meeting the people that I had been told were blood-thirsty religious fanatics who were intent on destroying my country and our way of life, and discovering that aside from a few zealots, the assertion was just not the truth.  Zealotry is a very prominent, driving force in the world, and all countries, peoples and religions have them.  Yes, there are zealots even within our highly esteemed Christianity, as evidenced by Pat Robertson calling for our government to assassinate the elected president of Venezuela.   My pointing out fanaticism from within our own government, and the lies told in order to start the slaughter of a nation that had nothing to do with the September 11 attack on our country, is why I was taken before a Kangaroo court and imprisoned as a result.  The garrison commander told the prosecutors that I was to do 18 months in prison before the investigation phase of the court martial even started.  The company commander was trying to come up with everything he could think of to smear me before they concentrated their efforts to put me in jail. 
 
I do not want to mislead anyone into thinking that I am a saint, because I have done many things in my life that are wrong and I am ashamed of doing them.  But, I decided that I was not going to add to that list by taking any further part in this war against a people that have done absolutely nothing to us. 
 
Tacitus, a Roman historian, said, "When monarchs through their bloodthirsty commanders lay waste a country, they dignify their atrocity by calling it 'making peace,'" or in this case, by calling it "spreading democracy."
 
 
We are being told that we are to continue the war in Iraq because their country needs us, and all the while our people suffer.  We continue to look outward, but isn't the truth within us?   We look to satisfy our egos by believing that we are so great that we can save others from themselves.  Isn't the truth that it is not up to us to save others, that to save them, we must leave them and face what must be saved within ourselves?
 
 
 
 
 
Posted by ChoiceAmericaNetwork at 21:23:27 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |
1 2 3